|
H* could not buy D*'s love, but she did purchase a lot of dirty work, and unfortunately
there are a lot of professionals
out there anxious for business.
It should be obvious to anybody who reads H*s testimony
that D* should have
continued living with his dad. So how could the law suits possibly go on and on? The attorneys
consistently made everything more difficult than it had to be by using a number of methods as listed below.
This stressed D* and the rest of the family. It was also incredibly expensive.
-
Cronyism and Court Ordered Payments
-
The first 'appointed neutral' child psychologist who we were ordered to pay, was in fact
a former client of the opposing attorney.
[see chapter 1]
-
The first ordered to be paid custody evaluator had a relationship with one of the attorneys.
[see chapter 1]
-
My attorney quit after I refused to pay off Sally Ray as a 'parenting couch'. Sally is the
wife of judge Wolmak. Sally retaliated by coming to court to testify against me.
In cross examination Sally admitted that
she had never met me, that my ex had never talked to her about me, that
she had never met my son, and in so
many words she admitted to having no information whatsoever.
[See Chapter 7 transcripts pp365-371 starting at the bottom of 365, see esp. p371.]
Judge Wisser found her testimony
credible.
[see Chapter 8 for Wisser's official findings of facts]
-
The judge ordered a person to be paid as a 'friend of the court'.
This turned out to be James Wallace the son of a state supreme court justice.
[see Chapter 6 various references, text search for "Wallace", pp329,331.]
-
I count on my fingers here while writing this, nine different people we had to pay by court
order. In addition I have been ordered to pay tens of thousands of dollars outside of any support
issues some going directly to attorney Margo Fox. My bank account was directly seized before
taxes or professional fees were paid on the total leaving me no money for food or rent and debt.
-
In a no-fault divorce state I received nothing from the common property and all of the debt.
Direct Extortion
H* took my business files from cabinets in my home office
and gave them to her attorney Sara Brandon who used them
to extort a reversal of the sole managing conservatorship of D* by dad
[documentation of this starts Chapter 3 p54 runs through chapter]
These
documents had nothing to do with the divorce, and her taking
them broke secrecy agreements - especially when Sara Brandon
called a major client, AMD. That call destroyed my consulting
practice. D* and I paid dearly for their return.
This letter, "Aug
9,2001 from Sara Brandon Esq. to William Jang Esq" ,
demonstrates both the abuse of my business documents and the
artificial school schedule device to be mentioned next.
My own attorney Ted Terry through his assistant asked me
for $35,000 after the first hearing
and said that the summer possession agreement would be lost if I did not pay.
I did not pay, it was lost. When D* was not returned after the July 4th
visit with H*, my new attorney told me to play ball or things could be very bad for me.
He refused to point out some conflicted parties, saying that he couldn't do that as they
were his friends.
[starts here in chapter 3]
Dirty Legal Maneuvers
Attorney Sara Brandon demanded that D*
follow the school schedule for Round Rock Independent School district though he attended
a private school with a different
schedule located in Austin. When following the school schedule
for the school he attended, H* made allegations of abduction.
This next letter, "Aug
9,2001 from Sara Brandon Esq. to William Jang Esq" ,
demonstrates both the abuse of my business documents as mentioned above and the
artificial school schedule device.
Here are a couple more letters on the
school schedule. As is also
explained in the book In this particular instance
H* reported me for kidnapping when we took our spring break on schedule. She did not tell the
police we followed the school's school schedule. Even though the device was apparently
dissolved in the spring,
Brandon
used it again the next Christmas and I was again accused of abduction.
Vacations with D* were ruined by H*'s attorney Margo Fox moving hearings into them.
And it wasn't just D* and
me who suffered from this. For example, in 2006 H*'s attorney Margo Fox called a surprise emergency
hearing before Christmas during our break. She was trying to use psychologist Caryl Dalton to make
an argument that D* should not be allowed to be with his father at all. So instead of going on vacation
11 supporting witnesses, some of who took their own holiday time and drove in from Galveston,
were lined up in the hall in Georgetown Texas waiting to talk about what a crime this proposal
was. Although it was our rotation and no negative judgment was made the lost time and expense
caused D* to not get to visit his father's family that Christmas
holiday. The same trick was repeated in the summer to destroy a planned sailing trip.
Independent Action on the Part of the Attorneys
The Walters letter. H* and I hired the attorney
Brian Walters to fire the attorneys
working on the divorce case because we felt it was causing more damage than good. Brian
Walters took a retainer, and kept it. He said that the attorneys would not be fired. In short
the professionals were going to run up a bill and continue proceedings even without us.
-
Disregard for Evidence
Lara Nixon the paid 'guardian ad litem', said she lost the evidence. The divorce appeared to be
settled in June of 2001 with D* continuing to live with dad, but then
this happened,
so she would write her report without using evidence, but just base it on her own opinion.
She told me that her opinion was that D* should to go back to H* i.e. she was going to
keep everything going. This was not a
month after both H*'s spanking baby death threat etc. testimony ,
and her I can
touch him statement."
In general all the material on this website that existed up to the point in
time of employ was given to each and every attorney who worked on
the case, including H*'s testimony which had been officially
transcribed and available from the very beginning of all this in
the summer of 2001 - yet it kept going on and on.
In the more recent examples the CPS case worker, Mdm Walter had the
400 page long "ITIO a Child" for
only a day when she announced that she saw no evidence of abuse
by H* in it - and she wanted D* to be held in a the psychiatric ward
[ref].
As another example the current psychologist Gary York avoids the material
through a court order obtained by Margo Fox, H*'s attorney.
The judge arbitrarily disallowed discovery. He did this by not holding
opposing counsel to providing it, an by direct order.
[see Chapter 6 pp339-340]
Dr. Thorne held documents that potentially would have ended the
proceedings. It was a poison packet that shows just how far H* and her attorney had gone,
but he was not allowed to present it to the court because the H*'s attorney,
Margo Fox, said that Dr. Thorne was a
"consultant so the documents were work product privilege." However, Dr.
Thorne swore in court that he was neutral and not a consultant for Margo Fox or anyone else on
he case. No proof was presented
that he had done any consulting, yet Judge Wisser did not allow the material to be discovered.
How convenient for Ms. Fox who went on to demand tens in thousands in legal fees from dad.
-
Judge Wisser's Participation in the Suit
At various hearings we had four different judges. I could fault the first three for not putting a stop
to things and for ignoring conflicted relationships that they were almost certainly aware of, but they
did not participate at same level as Judge Wisser, the fourth of the judges. Judge Wisser did the following:
-
Judge Wisser scared D* by telling him that he had power over life and death.
Then Wisser asked D* what he thought about his mother. D* was very upset shaking and not looking people
in the eye.
[ref]
-
He ordered that any psychological means may be used on D*, including hypnosis.
[ref] (I have heard from Dr. York's assistant that this order is now in full affect.) For a history
of D*'s suffering as a result of such orders see other pages on this site
history of psychiatric abuse and
D* held in psychiatric
hospital as mom says he is brainwashed by dad, at the same time she tells dad she knows D* loves him for real,
she wants money (this was made possible by judge Wisser).
- Even after Sally Ray, judge Wolmak's wife, had testified not to having information to back her
testimony Judge Wisser officially ruled her to be a 'credible witness'.
[Wisser's findings of facts].
-
He appointed or tried to appoint many experts that had to be paid for by the parties,
including a paid 'friend of the court' who was the son of another judge.
[see Chapter 6 pp329,331, various references to Wallace.]
- He went against precedent in Family court and ordered the payment of tens of thousands of dollars in fees,
thus enforcing the message that the proceedings were not in the interest of D* but rather about money.
[matter of record].
- He ordered my bank account seized taking the total amount even before taxes and professional fees had
been paid, thus leaving me with debt and no money to eat or pay rent.
[matter of record].
- He issued protective orders including against people I didn't know and people I wanted to use as
witnesses.
[matter of record].
- He refused me an equal standing with the opposing attorney, not holding her
up to providing discovery etc. [various denied motions requestiong opposing counsel follow the rules are matter
of record]
He even went so far as to order Dr. Steve Thorne to _not_ provide discovery items at all.
[matter of record, also
fully explanation and transcripts ]
In Judge Wisser interviewed a witness directly in
the hall.
Chapter 7 ,
on page 382, a letter from a
witness explaining
This is illegal. The reason for the conversation may
not have been apparent to Ray and may have seemed innocent
however Judge Wisser had defied precedent and state law
requiring me to pay a friend of the court, a son of a supreme court justice,
Jim Wallace,
instead of paying for the insurance on my home (a large sailboat
I lived on). The boat was then lost. It appears that Judge Jon
Wisser went on a personal investigative journey at the time of
the hearings in an attempt to establish that my home had not
actually been lost in order to protect himself personally or to
be able to call me a fraud. He also interviewed D* about the
boat in the same meeting where he discussed his power over life
and death.
In 2008 they stopped bothering with the appearances and just started
taking money directly.
Judge Wisser has ordered me to pay approximately $50,000 independent of child support.
He ordered my bank account seized, and H*'s attorney took the money
from the account even before I paid taxes and professional fees on it. In addition Judge Wisser
double the child support maintenance. Not only does the amount exceed my net income in these times,
but I have no account to draw back on. The growing balance has been turned over for collection
and prosecution. On top of this, now for
the fourth time, H* has resurrected
the
abduction allegation.
It is my opinion that Judge Wisser believes I am hiding money and has created leverage to
force me to pay them. If so, he is wrong, after eight years of this, I am tapped dry.
|
The legal exploitation of spouses and children in divorce is
at the heart of the multihundred billion dollar
a year "divorce industry". Unfortunately we have the
opposite of oversight, we have the punishment of victims who
are so bold as to say something about the maltreatment of
their children. My complaint is far from the
only one. A cursory search of the Internet will find hundreds
if not thousands more and a dozen or so more books
on the topic. Indeed,
there is even an old cartoon that sums up the situation, it is
shown at the top of this page. The cartoonist missed the part
where kids are being ground into the dirty mud under the cows
hooves.
|
